In a systematic review published in Journal of general internal medicine, Nineteen studies were included in the review and reported wide variation in the extent of tests not followed-up: 6.8% to 62% for laboratory tests; 1.0% to 35.7% for radiology. The impact on patient outcomes included missed cancer diagnoses. Failure to follow-up test results is an important safety concern which requires urgent attention. These are US based studies. Problem in countries like ours probably will be manifold. I feel probably technology will play increasing role in minimising this in future.
A unique application of web 2.0 in Radiology (also known as Radiology 2.0) since 2004. Widely recognized and cited by various journals and magazines. One of the first mover in the world of Rad-blogging
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Blog Archive
-
▼
2012
(229)
-
▼
October
(17)
- Anomalous Right Coronary Artery Origin-MDCT
- Osteoblastic Secondaries-CT
- Dense Persistent Nephrogram -- Causes
- Space of Parona Infection-MRI
- Diabetic myonecrosis-MRI
- Van der knaap disease, a megalencephalic leukoence...
- Amyloidosis-Pathological Fracture
- Subcoracoid-Subscapularis Bursa MRI
- Chronic Tophaceous Gout-MRI
- Smartphones for Telestroke
- Perirectal Cyst-Differentials
- Unsual ganglion cyst in intercondylar notch in chi...
- DEXA Pitfall
- Do Referring doctors actually follow up on all ra...
- Ramus intermedius-LCA- Cardiac CT
- Pediatric Baker's Cyst-MRI
- MSK Radiology Conference
-
▼
October
(17)
No comments:
Post a Comment